aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>2022-03-13 14:22:47 -0400
committerKevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>2022-03-13 17:13:55 -0400
commitcc3c4c81e94f4dd32cf47c764883806897e11586 (patch)
treebdd9535650331f02ff4eaf3ac3419c2fb30c42dd
parent1de0d7507972ae82c2bbd7af5190e2ddc52b3185 (diff)
downloadkutter-cc3c4c81e94f4dd32cf47c764883806897e11586.tar.gz
kutter-cc3c4c81e94f4dd32cf47c764883806897e11586.tar.xz
kutter-cc3c4c81e94f4dd32cf47c764883806897e11586.zip
workflows: Add github tool to add a comment to PRs marked "reviewer needed"
Signed-off-by: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>
-rw-r--r--.github/workflows/reviewer-needed-label.yaml66
1 files changed, 66 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.github/workflows/reviewer-needed-label.yaml b/.github/workflows/reviewer-needed-label.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c4603b30
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/workflows/reviewer-needed-label.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# Add a comment to github PRs marked with the "reviewer needed" label
+name: "Add comment to PRs marked 'reviewer needed'"
+on:
+ pull_request_target:
+ types: [labeled]
+jobs:
+ add_comment:
+ if: github.repository == 'Klipper3d/klipper'
+ runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+ steps:
+ - uses: actions/github-script@v6
+ with:
+ script: |
+ if (context.payload.label.name != "reviewer needed")
+ return;
+ if (context.payload.pull_request.assignees.length > 0)
+ return;
+ msg = "Thank you for your contribution to Klipper."
+ + " Unfortunately, a reviewer has not assigned themselves to"
+ + " this GitHub Pull Request. All Pull Requests are reviewed"
+ + " before merging, and a reviewer will need to volunteer."
+ + " Further information is available at:"
+ + " https://www.klipper3d.org/CONTRIBUTING.html"
+ + "\n\n"
+ + "There are some steps that you can take now:"
+ + "\n"
+ + "1. Perform a self-review of your Pull Request by following"
+ + " the steps at:"
+ + " https://www.klipper3d.org/CONTRIBUTING.html#what-to-expect-in-a-review"
+ + "\n"
+ + " If you have completed a self-review, be sure to state the"
+ + " results of that self-review explicitly in the Pull Request"
+ + " comments. A reviewer is more likely to participate if the"
+ + " bulk of a review has already been completed."
+ + "\n"
+ + "2. Consider opening a topic on the [Klipper Discourse]"
+ + "(https://www.klipper3d.org/Contact.html#community-forum)"
+ + " server to discuss this work. The Discourse server is a good"
+ + " place to discuss development ideas and to engage users"
+ + " interested in testing. Reviewers are more likely to"
+ + " prioritize Pull Requests with an active community of users."
+ + "\n"
+ + "3. Consider helping out reviewers by reviewing other Klipper"
+ + " Pull Requests. Taking the time to perform a careful and"
+ + " detailed review of others work is appreciated. Regular"
+ + " contributors are more likely to prioritize the"
+ + " contributions of other regular contributors."
+ + "\n\n"
+ + "Unfortunately, if a reviewer does not assign themselves to"
+ + " this GitHub Pull Request then it will be automatically"
+ + " closed. If this happens, then it is a good idea to move"
+ + " further discussion to the [Klipper Discourse]"
+ + "(https://www.klipper3d.org/Contact.html#community-forum)"
+ + " server. Reviewers can reach out on that forum to let you"
+ + " know if they are interested and when they are available."
+ + "\n\n"
+ + "Best regards,\n"
+ + "~ Your friendly GitIssueBot"
+ + "\n\n"
+ + "PS: I'm just an automated script, not a human being.";
+ github.rest.issues.createComment({
+ issue_number: context.issue.number,
+ owner: context.repo.owner,
+ repo: context.repo.repo,
+ body: msg
+ })