$title "Option Parsing On a Budget" $tags C information Recently I was writing a little code generation utility which took lots of positional arguments. I wanted to add two optional features to this utility, these options would take no arguments. I decided to use `getopt` but realised that this would make the code depend on POSIX, I liked the idea of staying dependency free so I quickly investigated really simple solutions for option parsing (without compromises) which would be equivalent to POSIX and GNU `getopt`. $pre The first iteration of the code used `getopt`, this was some pretty standard `getopt` code. Very portable to all systems which implement the basic POSIX `getopt`. ```.c while (c = getopt(argc, argv, "dl"), c != -1) { switch (c) { case 'd': des_init = true; break; case 'l': comp_lit = true; break; case '?': usage(); default: assert("Option not implemented" == NULL); } } ``` My first attempt at replacing this code looked similar to the following: ```.c int opti; for (opti = 1; argv[opti] != NULL && argv[opti][0] == '-'; opti++) { if (strcmp(argv[opti], "--") == 0) { opti++; break; } for (const char *opt = &argv[opti][1]; *opt != '\0'; opt++) { switch (*opt) { case 'd': des_init = true; break; case 'l': comp_lit = true; break; default: fprintf(stderr, "%s unknown option -- %c\n", argv0, *opt); usage(); } } } ``` This replacement was POSIX `getopt` compliant in that it parsed options until it hit `--` or until the first non-option argument. This replacement was twice as long as the `getopt` version but did meant that the code no longer relied on POSIX. The `opti` variable had the same purpose as `optind` in getopt style code. I would have been happy with this version but I noticed that my program did not actually permit any arguments beginning with `-` and I was also up for the challenge. That being said, I don't think handling this is an essential feature. The final version, after a few unreadable iterations ended up being only 21 lines long. This version handles mixed positional and optional arguments by relying on the C standard which allows modification of `argv`. Additionally, this version made code which followed it more readable than the getopt version. It really seems like a win win. ```.c bool opts_end = false; argc = 0; for (int i = 1; argv[i] != NULL; i++) { if (opts_end || argv[i][0] != '-') { argv[argc++] = argv[i]; continue; } if (strcmp(argv[i], "--") == 0) { opts_end = true; continue; } for (const char *opt = &argv[i][1]; *opt != '\0'; opt++) { switch (*opt) { case 'd': des_init = true; break; case 'l': comp_lit = true; break; default: fprintf(stderr, "%s: unknown option -- %c\n", argv0, *opt); usage(); } } } ``` That being said, implementing mixed options and non-options could be considered a misfeature. It can cause unexpected problems more often than it solves them. Additionally, although GNU `getopt` does this, modifying `argv` is considered by some to be a bit of a dirty trick. But, as mentioned before, positional arguments in this particular codebase could not start with a hyphen, and implementing this feature seemed like a fun task. Obviously this code does not handle option arguments, that's because I didn't have a need for those. In the case that I needed option arguments I would likely have gone with `arg.h` or `getopt`. As a final note, the code in this post is taken from a MIT licensed codebase, and should be published as part of [pack](https://the-tk.com/cgit/pack) shortly.